The United States and Argentina have signaled intentions to withdraw from the WHO due to perceived bias and ineffective handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The US initially commenced this process in 2017 under Donald Trump, citing undue influence from China. Argentina’s new leadership echoes similar sentiments, underscoring concerns over the WHO’s independence and operational effectiveness during health crises.
The United States, as the largest contributor to the World Health Organization (WHO), initially announced its intention to withdraw on January 20, 2017, under President Donald Trump. The administration criticized the WHO for what it perceived as bias towards China, alleging that the organization had underplayed the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and delayed ceding authority to declare a global health emergency. Furthermore, there were concerns regarding the effective use of US financial contributions to the organization.
However, when the Biden administration assumed office, it abandoned the withdrawal plan. The longstanding critiques regarding the WHO’s policies have resurfaced, particularly with Donald Trump reaffirming his previous position. Recently, Argentina has joined this discourse, as Javier Milei’s spokesperson announced the country’s intentions to withdraw from the WHO, highlighting significant concerns over its management of health issues during the COVID-19 crisis.
Mr. Milei’s representative also voiced dissatisfaction regarding the WHO’s lack of autonomy and the influence exerted by other states on its operations, stating that there are “deep differences” in how the organization addresses health matters. These developments underscore a growing skepticism towards international health bodies by both the US and Argentina, raising questions about global health governance.
The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a critical role in global health, particularly evident during public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic. As a major funder, the United States has historically influenced WHO policies, but criticisms have arisen regarding the organization’s response to the pandemic and relations with countries such as China. In the wake of these challenges, several political leaders have voiced their discontent and called for reevaluating membership in the organization, reflecting growing nationalistic sentiments and skepticism towards international collaborations in health.
The intentions of the United States and Argentina to withdraw from the WHO highlight significant challenges and tensions within international health governance. Factors such as perceived political bias, ineffective use of funds, and dissatisfaction with the organization’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic have fueled these decisions. As these discussions unfold, they signal a potential shift in global health dynamics and the future of international cooperation in managing public health crises.
Original Source: globalsouthworld.com
