U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff proposed that Lebanon and Syria might normalize relations with Israel, citing regional political changes. He noted shifting dynamics impacting Iran-affiliated groups. However, Lebanon’s legal framework prohibits recognition of Israel. Analyst Yasser Zaatreh criticized Witkoff’s comments due to Israel’s military actions in the region. The potential for new relations hinges on developments includingSaudi Arabia’s policies and the future of the Palestinian state.
On Monday, U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff suggested that Lebanon and Syria might soon normalize relations with Israel during an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee. He indicated that regional political shifts could potentially extend to these countries, noting the challenges faced by Iran-aligned groups. Witkoff referenced the weakening influence of Hezbollah and the changing dynamics following the ousting of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime.
Witkoff stated that Lebanon could engage in the Abraham Peace Accords, as could Syria, stating, “So many profound changes are happening”. This viewpoint aligns with earlier comments from Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz, who posited that Lebanon may establish diplomatic relations with Israel if Saudi Arabia precedes this step. However, Lebanon continues to officially deny recognition of Israel, enforcing stringent legal prohibitions against its nationals visiting the country.
Political analyst Yasser Zaatreh deemed Witkoff’s remarks a tragedy, reflecting on Israel’s invasions of Lebanon and Syria. He criticized the U.S. administration, asserting that they act like deities issuing commands. Both countries have endured significant consequences from Israel’s actions amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza that has spanned over a year. Cross-border skirmishes with Hezbollah escalated into full-scale war in September 2024, resulting in considerable Lebanese casualties.
The situation intensified with Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon, amid ongoing ceasefire violations. In Syria, Israel has targeted sites associated with Hezbollah and Iran during the Gaza conflict, increasing military strikes in the south. Despite desires from Syria’s interim government for Israel to halt its military operations, the latter has intensified its engagement in the region.
Lebanese parliament member Wael Abou Faour remarked that Lebanon’s most likely course of action would be to establish a truce akin to the agreements of 1949, when several neighboring nations signed armistice deals with Israel. He emphasized the need for national unity among Lebanese citizens to confront external pressures, particularly from the U.S., regarding normalization efforts.
Despite Israel’s failure to meet withdrawal deadlines from southern Lebanon, it asserts its continued presence is necessary for security purposes against perceived threats. Witkoff expressed optimism regarding Saudi Arabia potentially normalizing relations with Israel amid the wider dynamics of the Abraham Accords, yet reiterated that Riyadh would condition any such move on the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. Trump has reiterated his ambition to expand these accords but has faced criticism for suggesting drastic measures in Gaza.
The remarks by U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff indicate a potential shift in diplomatic relations involving Lebanon and Syria with Israel, influenced by regional political transformations and the weakening of Iranian-linked groups. Nonetheless, significant legal and political barriers remain, particularly in Lebanon’s formal stance towards Israel. Analysts express skepticism regarding these developments, citing historical military conflicts and the deep-rooted political complexities in the region. The unfolding situation necessitates close monitoring as it could reshape future diplomatic landscapes.
Original Source: www.newarab.com
