Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes defended the nation’s sovereignty and its judicial independence amid U.S. criticism concerning digital platform regulations. He emphasized Brazil’s resilience since independence and the commitment to democracy, responding to legislative actions in the U.S. aimed at restricting his entry. His statements were supported by other justices, highlighting a collective stance on safeguarding Brazil’s constitutional values against external pressures.
On Thursday, Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes defended Brazil’s sovereignty while addressing criticism from U.S. officials who accused him of censorship related to digital platform regulations. Speaking from the plenary chamber, he emphasized Brazil’s judicial independence and resilience, asserting that Brazil is no longer a colony since its independence in 1822 and is committed to building a strong democratic republic under the Constitution of 1988.
Justice Moraes commented on the significance of the United Nations’ recognition of all member states as independent nations and reaffirmed Brazil’s dedication to democracy and human rights. His statements followed the approval of a bill by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee aimed at restricting his entry into the United States, a move spurred by his recent rulings.
The controversy escalated after Justice Moraes ordered Rumble, a right-wing video platform, to comply with local laws, including appointing a representative in Brazil. Rumble had previously resisted calls to suspend certain accounts and had filed a lawsuit against him in Florida. During a lecture at the University of São Paulo, Justice Moraes critiqued Big Tech companies, highlighting their lack of neutrality in public discourse.
Following Justice Moraes’ remarks, Chief Justice Luís Roberto Barroso reiterated the importance of protecting institutional integrity against coup attempts, asserting that the Supreme Court serves as a guardian of the Constitution and democracy. Justice Flávio Dino expressed solidarity with Moraes, underscoring their commitment to the principles of self-determination and equality.
Justice Gilmar Mendes, the Supreme Court’s longest-serving member, praised Moraes for his prudent defense of Brazil’s constitutional structure. In addition, the Brazilian Association of Federal Judges issued a statement supporting national sovereignty and judicial independence. These collective responses denote a strong stance against external pressures and affirm Brazil’s commitment to its democratic principles.
In conclusion, Justice Alexandre de Moraes and other Brazilian Supreme Court Justices assert Brazil’s sovereignty and judicial independence in the face of U.S. criticism. They affirm their dedication to defending democracy while addressing the challenges posed by digital platforms. The unity displayed among the Justices underscores Brazil’s commitment to its constitutional values amidst external influences.
Original Source: valorinternational.globo.com
