Activists in the Chuuk islands are advocating for independence from the Federated States of Micronesia, citing increasing dependency on US support and a desire for self-determination. Former attorney general Sabino Asor believes that independence would allow Chuuk to negotiate its own future. Historical ties to colonial powers and current political dynamics further complicate the matter, leading to calls for a delayed referendum on independence.
The Chuuk islands, located in the Pacific Ocean, are part of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), which maintains a close alliance with the United States, receiving substantial aid for various essential services. However, concerns regarding this dependency are growing, particularly from former attorney general Sabino Asor, who advocates for Chuuk’s independence to foster self-determination and reduce reliance on US support.
Asor argues that the current leadership fosters a culture of dependence on the United States, limiting Chuuk’s autonomy. He emphasizes the need for independence to negotiate a new agreement with the US or explore connections with other global powers, including former colonial nations like Spain and Germany, or even consider a partnership with China.
Historically, the Chuuk islands have experienced several colonial administrations, having been controlled by Spain, Germany, and Japan before becoming a US trust territory following World War II. As a part of the FSM, Chuuk has retained some autonomy since gaining independence, though the existing Compact of Free Association with the US could pose challenges if altered or terminated by US leadership decisions.
Political figures like Johnny Meippen recognize the advantages of remaining with the FSM under the current agreement, yet they stress the importance of preparedness for potential changes stemming from US domestic policy shifts. Sovereignty would enable Chuuk to reclaim jurisdiction over its waters and resources, enhancing economic independence.
The journey towards independence has been complex, marked by cultural concerns and economic realities. Asor highlights that the absence of a referendum, initially scheduled for March 2015 and subsequently delayed, reflects lingering anxieties about the political implications of self-governance. Both Asor and Meippen have been involved in efforts to address these issues through the Chuuk Political Status Commission.
The push for independence among advocates in the Chuuk islands illustrates a critical examination of their political and economic future. While recognizing the benefits of current ties with the FSM and the USA, activists like Sabino Asor urge for self-determination. With historical precedents and modern geopolitical dynamics at play, the discussions surrounding Chuuk’s independence are both crucial and complex, meriting careful consideration and action moving forward.
Original Source: www.dw.com
