Kenya is facing diplomatic backlash from Saudi Arabia and Qatar for its support of a charter signed by the paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) to establish a parallel Sudanese government. Both nations condemned this initiative, citing potential risks to Sudan’s unity and stability and stressing the need for parties to prioritize national interests. The RSF’s charter proposes a secular state in Sudan but has raised significant international concerns.
Kenya’s diplomatic relations have come under scrutiny following its endorsement of a charter signed by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) aimed at establishing a parallel government in Sudan. This charter has elicited mixed reactions, particularly criticism from significant Middle Eastern partners, specifically Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who have both publicly expressed their discontent regarding the initiative.
Both Qatar and Saudi Arabia issued statements condemning the formation of a parallel government, emphasizing its potential negative effects on diplomatic and trade relations with Kenya, where the charter was signed. Saudi Arabia particularly declared its disapproval of actions taken outside Sudan’s official frameworks that jeopardize the nation’s unity, urging a return to the principles of the Jeddah Declaration signed in May 2023.
The Saudi Foreign Ministry stated, “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s rejection of any illegitimate steps or measures taken outside the framework of the Republic of Sudan’s official institutions that may affect its unity,” reiterating its commitment to Sudan’s security and stability. They called on all conflicting parties to prioritize Sudan’s interests.
In a similar vein, Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs voiced its disapproval of external interference in Sudanese affairs and reaffirmed its commitment to the nation’s integrity. They stated that all parties must focus on national interests and avert impending divisions within the country, while also endorsing inclusive dialogue to foster lasting peace.
The criticism from these nations followed the RSF’s signing of a charter in Nairobi, which outlined ambitions for governance in areas held by rebels, advocating for a secular state and a unified national army. The charter designates Sudan as a “secular, democratic, non-centralized state,” permitting the existence of armed groups within its framework.
The criticisms from Saudi Arabia and Qatar highlight concerns regarding Kenya’s diplomatic approach, specifically its acceptance of the RSF’s charter. Both nations emphasize the importance of Sudan’s unity and stability, urging a return to established frameworks to avoid division and chaos. The situation underscores the complexity of Sudan’s political landscape and the significant influence of international diplomacy on internal affairs. The commitments from Saudi Arabia and Qatar advocate for peace, unity, and a focus on national interests, reflecting broader regional concerns for Sudan’s future.
Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke
