Jelani Cobb, dean of Columbia’s journalism school, has warned international students about expressing controversial views following the arrest of a graduate, Mahmoud Khalil. He stated that students should be cautious about publishing on sensitive issues due to potential risks to their visa status. This caution comes amidst significant criticism of the university’s response to student activism and threats to deportation under the current political climate.
In light of the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University recent graduate, warnings have surfaced regarding the safety of international students. Jelani Cobb, dean of Columbia’s journalism school, cautioned international students against discussing controversial topics such as Gaza or Ukraine on social media. He emphasized that “nobody can protect you” as these students approach graduation amidst heightened tensions around deportations.Since Khalil’s arrest, Columbia’s administrative responses have drawn criticism for their inadequacy in defending him and other student activists. Amidst backlash from congressional Republicans and the Trump administration, significant grants to the university were also canceled. Critics, like Dan Froomkin from Press Watch, argue that such advisories contribute to a worrying culture of compliance with authoritarianism, claiming students are being urged to silence themselves preemptively.Kelly McBride, an ethics expert at the Poynter Institute, noted the risks for non-citizen students, asserting that pro-Palestinian expression could lead to visa repercussions. She also highlighted how restricting such voices deprives audiences of valuable perspectives that citizens may overlook. Stuart Karle, a First Amendment lawyer, advised that international students should exercise caution but not feel completely hampered; he suggested waiting until returning home to publish sensitive work. It remains uncertain whether other institutions have relayed similar warnings to their international student populations, who may lack the same protections as U.S. citizens.
The recent remarks by Columbia University officials underscore the precarious status of international students in the current political climate. As authorities tighten controls over expressions related to contentious global issues, students are confronted with difficult decisions regarding their speech and potential legal ramifications. The dialogue surrounding this topic serves as a reminder of the need for educational institutions to provide support and clearer legal guidance, empowering students to express their views without fear of repercussions. The implications of these discussions resonate beyond the university, impacting the broader discourse on freedom of expression and democratic principles.
Original Source: forward.com
