Tensions between South Africa and Rwanda escalate over accusations that the Rwandan-backed M23 rebels killed South African peacekeepers in the DRC. As the fighting intensifies, both nations exchange sharp accusations regarding military roles and intentions, highlighting a complex historical relationship marked by conflict and diplomatic strains.
Diplomatic tensions between South Africa and Rwanda have escalated following accusations from South African President Cyril Ramaphosa that the M23 rebel group, allegedly backed by Rwanda, has killed South African peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). As M23 captured significant territories, including Goma, South Africa issued a stern warning that continued attacks on its troops would be perceived as an act of war.
In response, Rwandan President Paul Kagame accused South Africa of supporting a “belligerent force” involved in combat against the Congolese population. The conflict has resulted in the deaths of 13 South African soldiers recently, adding to the toll of previous casualties since South Africa’s military involvement in the DRC began in the late 1990s.
Relations between South Africa and Rwanda have been complicated historically, including previous diplomatic expulsions and mutual accusations. Following a seemingly reconciliatory visit by Ramaphosa to Rwanda last year, tensions have resurfaced, particularly in light of the recent deaths of peacekeepers deployed as part of a regional force addressing ongoing conflicts in eastern DRC.
In a social media post, Ramaphosa articulated the need for a ceasefire and peace talks, asserting that South Africa’s military presence was not intended as a declaration of war, directly alluding to Rwanda. However, the South African Defense Minister suggested that warning shots fired at their troops might lead to a declaration of war.
Kagame refuted the claims regarding M23 and the Rwandan military’s involvement, asserting that the Rwandan Defense Force is a legitimate army, not a militia. He alleged that South African officials’ statements included misrepresentations about the circumstances of their soldiers’ deaths and criticized South Africa’s involvement as counterproductive.
The Democratic Republic of Congo has been a site of extensive conflict, heavily influenced by the involvement of neighboring countries, including South Africa and Rwanda. South Africa’s military has operated in the region since the end of apartheid, with its commitment driven by both political and economic interests, particularly in gaining access to the DRC’s mineral wealth. The M23 rebel group has re-emerged as a significant threat, capturing key areas and impacting regional stability, leading to heightened military and diplomatic responses from South Africa. The Southern African Development Community (Sadc) has mandated South African troops to participate in peacekeeping efforts. The current situation is complicated by South Africa’s military limitations and the internal dynamics of different armed groups operating in eastern DRC, creating a precarious environment for peacekeeping forces.
The strained relations between South Africa and Rwanda have resulted in a serious diplomatic dispute over the ongoing conflict in the DRC. With South African soldiers at risk and mounting casualties, President Ramaphosa faces pressure to balance military commitments while navigating a diplomatic minefield. The impending decisions by the Sadc regarding the continuation of South African military involvement remain crucial to the political and social stability of the DRC and the broader region.
Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk
