The Tagadum coalition in Sudan has officially dissolved due to internal conflicts over plans for a parallel government in RSF-controlled areas. Bakry Eljack, the coalition’s spokesperson, announced the end of its existence, a decision stemming from divergent views on governance legitimacy. The coalition’s factions will now operate independently, each with its own organizational framework, focusing on their goals for peace and democracy in Sudan.
The Coordination of the Civil Forces Alliance, also known as “Tagadum,” has officially disbanded due to significant internal disagreements concerning the establishment of a parallel government in areas overseen by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Bakry Eljack, the coalition’s spokesperson, lamented this development, confirming, “Tagadum is no longer in existence, and I am no longer the spokesperson for this body.” He shared this sentiment during an interview with Al Jazeera TV, calling the dissolution “sad.”
During a meeting led by Abdallah Hamdok, the coalition addressed the legitimacy of governance in Sudan and the potential for forming a government as a viable solution to ongoing challenges. However, the factional calls for a parallel government in RSF-dominated territories ignited divisions within the coalition. The Sudanese Revolutionary Front (SRF), consisting of various armed groups and civil organizations from Darfur and eastern Sudan, expressed support for these efforts.
A press release from Tagadum outlined the outcomes of the meeting, revealing two contrasting positions regarding the parallel government initiative. This divergence prompted the decision to separate into two distinct groups, each adopting their own political and organizational identities moving forward. Each faction is now empowered to pursue its respective goals and approaches towards peace, democracy, and addressing the challenges posed by the former regime.
In conclusion, the dissolution of Sudan’s Tagadum coalition marks a significant shift in the political landscape, as internal conflicts regarding a parallel government led to its breakdown. The coalition’s factions will now operate independently, each adhering to their distinct visions for peace and governance in Sudan. This separation reflects the complexity of Sudan’s ongoing struggle for legitimate representation and governance amidst factional divides.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
