The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of Sudan are solidifying control by establishing a parallel government in Nairobi as they vie for legitimacy amid a conflict with the army. They aim to establish themselves as the recognized governing power and are leveraging diplomatic efforts to undermine the Sudanese Army’s authority. Critics question the RSF’s commitment to democracy due to its violent actions in the past.
Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have established a parallel government in Nairobi as part of their strategy to solidify control over the country amidst ongoing conflict with Sudan’s army. Efforts to gain diplomatic recognition are paramount for the RSF as they seek to position themselves as the legitimate governing body of Sudan. Insiders report that RSF aims to challenge the Sudanese Army’s authority at international platforms such as the United Nations.
Ibrahim al-Mirghani, a politician backing the RSF, indicated that recognition from neighboring countries would be contingent on the RSF’s ability to restore security and reduce violence. The RSF’s strategy includes presenting themselves as a legitimate governing alternative and forming alliances with local political groups, positioning themselves as a key player in Sudan’s transition to civilian rule.
Al-Hadi Idris, who leads an armed faction aligned with the RSF, emphasized that their focus is on maintaining peace while ensuring the government’s capability to defend its citizens. Idris asserted that unlike paramilitaries, a government has the right to acquire advanced weaponry for national defense, distinguishing their objectives from those of a militia.
Recently, the RSF formalized a political charter with various parties and armed groups in Nairobi, which is intended to lay the groundwork for a new government termed the ‘Government of Peace and Unity.’ However, the RSF is now asserting that they represent the authentic government of Sudan and plan to undermine the Sudanese Army’s influence through diplomatic means.
During the charter signing event in Nairobi, Abdalla Hamdok, a former Sudanese Prime Minister, championed it as a pivotal step towards a democratic Sudan. Yet, skeptics view this as a maneuver by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, to acquire international credibility while maneuvering for power.
The Sudanese military leadership decried the Nairobi conference, accusing the Kenyan government of injustice in favor of the RSF. This adds strain to Kenya’s diplomatic relationships, caught in the middle of regional conflicts as Sudan continues to accuse it of partiality.
Nevertheless, the RSF’s history of violence, including allegations of war crimes and ethnic attacks, raises significant concerns about their genuine commitment to a democratic process. Critics maintain that their international engagement may serve as a façade over their underlying authoritarian motivations.
Kenya’s involvement in facilitating the RSF’s political maneuvers has drawn criticism, particularly from Sudan’s military leadership. The situation escalated to the point where Sudan expelled Kenya’s ambassador, highlighting growing tensions while Kenya insists it remains focused on promoting stability in the region.
In summary, the RSF’s establishment of a parallel government in Nairobi illustrates their determination to secure legitimacy and power amid ongoing conflict with Sudan’s army. Their diplomatic efforts, coupled with strategic alliances, suggest a calculated approach to governance. However, skepticism regarding their commitment to democracy persists due to their violent history, signaling that their aspirations may be rooted in authoritarianism rather than civilian governance.
Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke
