Russia proposes to mediate between Iran and America, emphasizing negotiation over conflict. Trump expresses a willingness to engage with Iran regarding nuclear issues, yet challenges persist. Expert analyses suggest that the U.S. policy under Trump is marked by uncertainty, and comparisons with Ukraine are flawed. Iran’s military developments could pose further threats to global security, complicating diplomatic efforts.
In a commentary by Arman-e-Emrooz, it was discussed that Russia has proposed to mediate between Iran and the United States. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov emphasized that both nations should resolve their issues through negotiations, and Russia is willing to facilitate this dialogue. The U.S. administration under President Trump has shown an interest in establishing contacts with Iran over critical matters, including the nuclear program.
President Trump expressed his desire for a verifiable nuclear peace agreement that would enable Iran’s peaceful development. However, Iran has firmly stated that it will not engage in negotiations under pressure and insisted on the unlikelihood of direct talks with the U.S. concerning nuclear issues while the maximum pressure policy remains in effect.
Shargh highlighted the uncertainty in Trump’s approach to Iran, stressing that no substantial progress has been achieved in addressing the ongoing complexities surrounding Iran’s nuclear situation. Three pivotal issues—an increase in uranium enrichment, unanswered questions from the U.N. agency, and disputes over inspector approvals—have contributed to the deadlock. The tensions between U.S. and European stances regarding Zelensky and the Ukraine conflict may further complicate negotiations and provoke a potential crisis.
Ettelaat, through an interview with expert Ali Bigdeli, examined the connection between Trump’s approach to Ukraine and his potential dealings with Iran. Bigdeli remarked on the complexities surrounding the Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Trump’s actions towards Zelensky should not be directly compared to any negotiations with Iran, as the circumstances differ significantly. He cautioned against the idea that dialogue with the West is unnecessary for resolving Iran’s challenges.
Ham Mihan reported on Iran’s new warship, the Shahid Bagheri, suggesting that, while it may not be as technologically advanced as modern military vessels, it reflects lessons learned from previous conflicts, particularly regarding the effectiveness of missile technologies in naval warfare. Iran could leverage its advancements to threaten global maritime trade, especially if there is coordination between the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and local militias like the Houthi insurgents. Lessons drawn from regional conflicts have equipped Tehran with a strategic edge in military capabilities, which traditional arms control measures may struggle to mitigate.
In summary, Russia’s initiative to mediate between Iran and America signals a potential diplomatic avenue amid ongoing complexities in the nuclear negotiations. President Trump’s mixed signals further complicate the situation, while developments in Iran’s military capabilities underline the regional challenges. The discourse among experts from various Iranian sources highlights the intricate interplay of international relations that could impact future negotiations and stability in the region.
Original Source: www.tehrantimes.com
