India is positioned to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war as it balances relations with both sides and maintains acceptability among key nations involved. With crucial negotiations ongoing, India’s involvement could prompt a resolution. Concerns about failure should not deter its aspirations as a global power, as mediation can yield significant geopolitical advantages regardless of specific outcomes.
The notion that India should delay mediation in international conflicts, such as the Ukraine-Russia war, until it gains more power is fundamentally flawed. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) expressed India’s readiness to support peaceful resolutions before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Kyiv. New Delhi now has an opportune moment to facilitate peace discussions to end the prolonged conflict.
India’s decision to maintain a neutral stance on Russia’s invasion and balance its relations between the West and Russia has proven beneficial thus far. New Delhi can take pride in its strategic choices, particularly given the current dynamics of global power politics. As the world shifts amidst evolving negotiations, India must engage proactively rather than remain passive.
There are three compelling reasons for India to step forward in mediating the conflict at this juncture. Firstly, the timing is crucial as Russia seeks to alleviate sanctions while engaging in dialogue with the US, with current discussions taking place in Riyadh. Active participation from India could facilitate inclusion of Ukraine in these conversations, enabling all parties to realize the necessity of a resolution as the war approaches its conclusion.
Secondly, India enjoys a degree of acceptability among the key nations involved in the crisis. Unlike China, India is viewed more favorably by Russia and the West, creating a unique position to act as a trusted mediator. Subsequently, India has the potential to foster dialogue, aligning with the interests of all parties concerned.
Finally, facilitating mediation not only serves to benefit international stakeholders but also enhances India’s own standing as a global player. Engaging in peace negotiations is essential for positioning India as a key actor in a multipolar world, as assertive participation is crucial for recognition in international matters. Moreover, should a ceasefire be established, Indian peacekeepers would likely be welcomed, given their established reputation for neutrality.
Despite these opportunities, three factors may deter India from acting decisively. A prevalent concern is the fear of failure and the possibility of mediation efforts yielding no positive outcomes. However, historical precedents illustrate that mediation often leads to geopolitical advantages, regardless of the initial success of negotiations. Effective mediation focuses on fostering dialogue between warring parties, which is often a pivotal aspect of conflict resolution.
Practically, India should consider appointing a special envoy to engage with all conflict parties, ascertain their perspectives, and offer a neutral venue for discussions. The argument that India should await increased power to mediate is misjudged; the country possesses considerable economic strength compared to other mediators. Meaningful participation is based on political commitment rather than mere economic size. Given India’s history of receiving mediation, it is essential now for India to extend its hand in mediating conflicts abroad.
In conclusion, India stands at a critical juncture, with a unique opportunity to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. By leveraging its neutral position and willingness to engage in peace discussions, India can enhance its international stature and influence. Although fears of failure may exist, the potential geopolitical and strategic benefits are significant. With timely and decisive action, India can contribute positively to global conflict resolution.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
