Coca-Cola and other companies are potentially funding Sudan’s civil war through their reliance on gum arabic, primarily sourced from the region. The ingredient, while essential in many products, is increasingly trafficked from rebel-controlled areas, complicating ethical sourcing. With ongoing conflicts affecting exports and local economies, companies face a significant dilemma in addressing their supply chains amidst a humanitarian crisis.
The global trade in gum arabic, a crucial ingredient found in various consumer products such as Coca-Cola and cosmetics, is reportedly financing both sides in the civil war in Sudan. Approximately 80% of the world’s gum arabic is sourced from Sudan, where it is increasingly being trafficked from areas controlled by rebel groups. This situation complicates efforts by Western companies to disentangle their supply chains from the ongoing conflict.
Gum arabic has been utilized for thousands of years, with its earliest use recorded around 2000 BC for food and mummification processes. Today, its qualities make it valuable across diverse sectors, including the food and pharmaceutical industries. However, ongoing political instability and conflict have severely affected the exports of gum arabic from Sudan, leading to potential shortages.
The United States once imposed sanctions on Sudan due to terrorism concerns but exempted gum arabic, highlighting its economic importance. In light of rising conflicts, known factions have taken control of gum-harvesting areas, making the commodity a vital funding source for the combatants. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) leverage tax and transaction fees from the trade to finance their military efforts.
Despite the ongoing tragedy, very few Western corporations are actively seeking to avoid Sudanese gum arabic, citing potential harm to local livelihoods. Furthermore, the issue of certification complicates procurement, as traders from other nations without a proven history have begun supplying gum at lower prices, muddying the ethical sourcing landscape. Experts assert that almost all gum currently sourced from Sudan is acquired through illegal channels due to the absence of authoritative control.
While companies like Coca-Cola and Nestlé remain silent on the matter, it is critical for industry players to re-evaluate their sourcing practices to ensure they do not inadvertently contribute to the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Sudan.
In summary, the gum arabic industry in Sudan poses a complex ethical issue for Western companies, as their reliance on this ingredient may be financing a brutal civil war. The conflict has significantly disrupted the industry and challenged responsible sourcing practices. It is crucial for companies to navigate these concerns thoughtfully while considering the livelihoods of those dependent on the trade.
Original Source: theweek.com
